BARNES, LEE R
Reported identity cluster · not a verified person-level entity.
Contribution summary
Latest amendment per committee transaction ID · memo rows excluded from net
Reported identity evidence
Raw context retained from FEC Schedule A rows
- Reported names linked
- BARNES, LEE R · BARNES, LEE R.
- Reported ZIPs seen
- 28786
- Locations seen
- WAYNESVILLENC
- Occupation and employer
- AG & LAND CONSULTANTSELF-EMPLOYEDCategory: Self-Employed & FreelanceLAND CONSULTANTLEE R BARNESLAND CONSULTANTSELF EMPLOYEDCategory: Self-Employed & FreelanceOWNERLAND STEWARDSHIP CONSULTINGSELF-EMPLOYEDLAND STEWARDSHIP CONSULTING
- What is linked
- Compatible names blocked on ZIP5 or corroborated across addresses by employer, occupation, and state
- Category
- Self-Employed & Freelance
Industry not yet classified for LEE R BARNES · LAND STEWARDSHIP CONSULTING.
Reported employment categories, not company industries.
Loading reported occupation interpretations…
How these records are matched
A high-confidence grouping of compatible filed-name and address variants corroborated by reported employer, occupation, and location evidence. ZIP+4 extensions are retained as evidence but ignored for matching. This is a reported identity cluster, not yet a verified person-level entity.
Contributions by recipient party and committee type
Recipient party from FEC registration, linked candidates, or affirmative support activity
Recipient party affiliation
Contributions grouped by each recipient’s reported party or inferred alignment
Recipient committee type
Type of political committee receiving the contribution
Party totals describe recipients, not the contributor’s party registration or beliefs. FEC-reported and linked-candidate parties take precedence over inferred activity. Opposition to a candidate does not count as support for another party. Open a recipient to inspect its classification evidence and separate support and opposition disclosures.
Money network
Contributor-to-committee connections sized by absolute reported transaction total
Showing 0 of 0 loaded matching connections on the left and 3 of 3 on the right, up to 10 per side by absolute amount. This is not the full transaction history. Party filters include mixed-party contributions or activity. Full connection amounts are shown, not just the selected party’s share. Party labels use reported party information or inferred contributions/activity—not an individual’s party registration.
Contributions by recipient committee
3 recipient committees · largest reported totals first · expand an arrow for transactions
Reported totals sum current non-memo transactions, including reported refund entries, and can include both a conduit’s and a recipient’s report of the same contribution. These are not verified net contributions after refunds. Expand a recipient to inspect transaction types, reporting sides and source records.
Candidate campaign receiving transfers
COOPER, ROYDemocraticFEC reportedU.S. Senate · North Carolina · Statewide
Receiving campaign: COOPER FOR NORTH CAROLINA
Candidate details & sources
FEC candidate ID:
S6NC00407· 2025–2026 reporting cycle
These campaigns received reported contributions or transfers from this committee during the selected cycle. This is not a complete participant list or an allocation of any individual donor's gift; other recipients may include parties and PACs.
Principal candidate campaign
OSSOFF, T. JONATHANDemocraticFEC reportedU.S. Senate · Georgia · Statewide
Candidate details & sources
FEC candidate ID:
S8GA00180· 2025–2026 reporting cycle
No candidate connection found in the registration links or sender-reported committee transfers checked for this cycle. Conduit routing and independent spending are not included in this check.
Source & identity status
Trace every claim back to the public record
The FEC publishes names and addresses as reported, but does not assign a persistent ID to each individual contributor. GovMoneyGraph links variants here only when employer and location or occupation evidence corroborates compatible names; conflicting middle initials remain separate. These heuristic clusters stay reviewable until promoted into the persistent entity graph through the labeled gold-set process.