Receipts reported by
OCASIO-CORTEZ, ALEXANDRIA
FEC receipts reported by principal campaign committee ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ FOR CONGRESS. Compare contributors by industry, reported employer, occupation, and state. Every ranking defaults to the highest dollar amount first.
States
Top 100 · Sorted by reported transaction total, descending · 2025–2026
| Rank | State | Reported transaction total | Share of dollars | Number of transactions | Average transaction amount | Median transaction amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | California | $3,089,775 | 23.8% | 87,066 | $35 | $20 |
| 2 | New York | $1,618,186 | 12.5% | 43,397 | $37 | $20 |
| 3 | Washington | $705,805 | 5.4% | 21,339 | $33 | $20 |
| 4 | Massachusetts | $648,511 | 5.0% | 17,699 | $37 | $20 |
| 5 | Texas | $548,594 | 4.2% | 16,136 | $34 | $20 |
| 6 | Florida | $514,492 | 4.0% | 16,331 | $32 | $15 |
| 7 | Oregon | $406,520 | 3.1% | 12,964 | $31 |
Refunds reduce net dollars, so a group’s share can be negative or exceed 100%. Displayed percentages are rounded and may not add to 100%.
Rankings use published local bulk rows, exclude memo-only duplicates, and retain refunds as negative amounts. Employer and occupation are contributor-reported; industry totals cover receipts with an available industry attribution. Contributor-row badges describe the contributor’s available contribution-pattern evidence, not party registration; open the contributor profile for the full-cycle split. A reconciled current-amendment ledger is still being built.