Receipts reported by
NEAL, RICHARD E
FEC receipts reported by principal campaign committee RICHARD E NEAL FOR CONGRESS COMMITTEE. Compare contributors by industry, reported employer, occupation, and state. Every ranking defaults to the highest dollar amount first.
States
Top 100 · Sorted by reported transaction total, descending · 2025–2026
| Rank | State | Reported transaction total | Share of dollars | Number of transactions | Average transaction amount | Median transaction amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Massachusetts | $191,975 | 33.2% | 207 | $927 | $1,000 |
| 2 | New York | $63,250 | 10.9% | 29 | $2,181 | $1,000 |
| 3 | District of Columbia | $47,250 | 8.2% | 51 | $926 | $500 |
| 4 | California | $43,500 | 7.5% | 18 | $2,417 | $3,000 |
| 5 | Connecticut | $28,500 | 4.9% | 27 | $1,056 | $1,000 |
| 6 | Michigan | $27,300 | 4.7% | 13 | $2,100 | $2,500 |
| 7 | Maryland | $27,250 | 4.7% | 24 | $1,135 |
Refunds reduce net dollars, so a group’s share can be negative or exceed 100%. Displayed percentages are rounded and may not add to 100%.
Rankings use published local bulk rows, exclude memo-only duplicates, and retain refunds as negative amounts. Employer and occupation are contributor-reported; industry totals cover receipts with an available industry attribution. Contributor-row badges describe the contributor’s available contribution-pattern evidence, not party registration; open the contributor profile for the full-cycle split. A reconciled current-amendment ledger is still being built.